1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allsm [11]
3 years ago
5

A woman was injured when the car she was driving was struck by a moving truck. The woman brings an action for personal injuries

against the moving company. The complaint alleges that the driver was drunk at the time of the accident and that the moving company was negligent in hiring him and permitting him to drive knowing that he had a drinking problem and convictions for drunk driving. The driver is called as a witness by the moving company and is expected to testify that he was not drunk at the time of the accident. Instead, the driver states on direct examination that he had had several beers as he drove his truck that evening and was under the influence of drugs when his truck struck the woman's car. The counsel for the moving company wants to confront the driver with his deposition testimony that he was completely sober at the time of the accident.
Will this evidence be permitted?
a. No, the statement is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
b. No, the moving company cannot impeach its own witness.
c. Yes, but it may be used only to impeach the driver.
d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.
Social Studies
1 answer:
egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.

Explanation:

The evidence will be permitted to impeach and as substantive evidence. The submission will be used to discredit the statement of the driver especially if it on record that the witness has, on another occasion, made statements that are inconsistent with some material part of his present testimony.

You might be interested in
In an attempt to provoke Mexico into war, James Polk ordered General Zachary Taylor to lead a small army across a disputed borde
zepelin [54]
On May 11, 1846, President James Polk updated Congress on recent events concerning Texas. The emissary he sent to Mexico with an offer of cash in exchange for disputed lands was rudely rebuffed. Then, Mexicans opened fire on Americans at the Rio Grande River, killing 16. "War exists," Polk declared.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the ideals of popular sovereignty, social contract, natural rights, and individual rights?
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

<u>Popular sovereignty</u>

Is the ideals which state that a society need to be run according to the will of the majority of the people rather than a small number of elites.

<u>Social contract</u>

An ideal which state that a society can only be run if the people and the government engaged in a social contract. The people agree to let themselves constricted under the control of government legislations. In return, the government must work to increase the well being of the people.

<u>Natural rights</u>

Natural rights are a set of universal rights that cannot be undone / violated by any legislations or government actions under any circumstances.

<u>Individual rights</u>

Individual rights are a set of rights that bestowed to the people through a specific legal system. This rights can come and go depending on who held the position within the government.

3 0
3 years ago
According to Piaget's theory, during the concrete operational stage, a child is still unlikely to demonstrate Group of answer ch
Elza [17]

Answer:

Correct answer is (2). the ability to think hypothetically

Explanation:

In Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, concrete operational stage is the third stage of Piaget’s theory and occurs between 7 and 11 years age bracket. It is often refers to as preadolescence years. In this stage, hypothetical thinking is not yet developed and children can only solve problems with the use logical reasoning.

4 0
3 years ago
In 1786 , virginians called a convention in annapolis to discuss problems with the
statuscvo [17]
The answer is A) In 1786, Virginians called a Convention in Annapolis to discuss problem with the Constitution. That's why it's called "The constitutional Convention."
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This was the compromise reached by Northern and Southern States on
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

3/5th COMPROMISE

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise, Black Personhood, and Southern Representation. One issue that arose at the Constitutional Convention and almost derailed it was the issue of counting slaves for representation in Congress. ... The compromise reached was to count slaves as three-fifths of a person.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the text, why does Douglass say that “learning to read had already come, to torment” him?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help with goverment
    6·1 answer
  • That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it
    10·2 answers
  • A main goal of the progressives was to improve this problem is?
    15·1 answer
  • Which area did Julius Ceaser conquer before making the Rhine a boundary of the roman empire
    6·2 answers
  • One valuable natural resource that Greece had was
    10·2 answers
  • Please i really need help with this its for an essay and its due at midnight
    6·2 answers
  • Vhat type of financial institution would have the lowest rates on loans?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Cynicism not become popular until after Alexander the Great’s death?
    12·1 answer
  • Do you believe in ghosts—why or why not? (Bonus question: If so, are you afraid of ghosts?)
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!