1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allsm [11]
3 years ago
5

A woman was injured when the car she was driving was struck by a moving truck. The woman brings an action for personal injuries

against the moving company. The complaint alleges that the driver was drunk at the time of the accident and that the moving company was negligent in hiring him and permitting him to drive knowing that he had a drinking problem and convictions for drunk driving. The driver is called as a witness by the moving company and is expected to testify that he was not drunk at the time of the accident. Instead, the driver states on direct examination that he had had several beers as he drove his truck that evening and was under the influence of drugs when his truck struck the woman's car. The counsel for the moving company wants to confront the driver with his deposition testimony that he was completely sober at the time of the accident.
Will this evidence be permitted?
a. No, the statement is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
b. No, the moving company cannot impeach its own witness.
c. Yes, but it may be used only to impeach the driver.
d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.
Social Studies
1 answer:
egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.

Explanation:

The evidence will be permitted to impeach and as substantive evidence. The submission will be used to discredit the statement of the driver especially if it on record that the witness has, on another occasion, made statements that are inconsistent with some material part of his present testimony.

You might be interested in
A group of people who force other people to hurt or humiliate themselves as initiation into their group is committing which of t
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

Hazing

Explanation:

Hazing is defined as any action or situation created by the members of a group as a way to introduce a person into the group and often harassment, embarrassment, physical discomfort or harm.

Hazing also involves forced consumption of alcohol.

It is done to prove their worth to join.

Some of the common places where hazing occurs are universities, colleges, schools, sports, clubs, societies, etc.

Hazing can be subtle, harassing and violent.

8 0
3 years ago
taste aversions are learned through classical conditioning. match each example to its corresponding stimulus or response.
Julli [10]

By matching each example to its corresponding stimulus or response, we have the following:

Unconditioned Response: vomiting;

  • This is a condition or actions that occur without learning it. It is inborn.

Unconditioned Stimulus: food poisoning;

  • This is a form of stimulus that results in a natural reaction without forcing it or intentionally doing it.

Conditioned Response: refusal to eat;

  • This is a type of response that is learned. It is intentionally done by the subject.

Conditioned Stimulus: a taste of the chicken salad

  • This is often considered a neutral stimulus initially but later turns to a learned response over time.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are different forms of taste aversion experienced in living things, particularly humans and animals.

The available options are the following

Stimulus

  • Unconditioned Response:
  • Unconditioned Stimulus:
  • Conditioned Response:
  • Conditioned Stimulus:

Examples

  • a taste of the chicken salad
  • refusal to eat
  • vomiting food poisoning

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19843671

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many young people struggle to cope with post-school destinations. Write a short
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The move from high school to university is one of liberation. There is flexibility to complete projects and courses, as well as other activities, at the university. There are no daily home duties that must be completed. The discipline is not the same as at school. The officials have been replaced. In the case of school, there are mandatory enrollment, commitments, and homework. There is no space for change in the rules.

4 0
3 years ago
George met Paul at a seminar for the first time. When Paul expressed his political interests, George felt that Paul was very muc
mariarad [96]
He inference of a slave
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pacifists are people who
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
Sendoemdmdnnnn. Disowns
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ethical relativism cannot make a claim to tolerance being universally good if all values are culture-relative.
    7·2 answers
  • In what ways did farming improve the quality of life for neolithic people?
    6·2 answers
  • Consumers tend to use decision-making shortcuts when they: Select one: a. ​evaluate information critically. b. are opportunistic
    15·1 answer
  • On a divided highway, you must _________ unless directed to do otherwise by a sign, traffic control device, or police officer.
    14·1 answer
  • Ccording to freud, if a child's needs are not met or are overindulged at one particular psychosexual stage, the child may become
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the southern industry grow in the late 1800s
    5·1 answer
  • A researcher examining the way Apple has used the letter "I" in its products (I-Pod, I-Phone) as a symbol to create identity amo
    5·1 answer
  • If you were offered the position of mayor of your city, would you take it?
    14·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP HISTORY EXAM
    15·1 answer
  • Which situation would probably increase a country’s sense of nationalism?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!