1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allsm [11]
3 years ago
5

A woman was injured when the car she was driving was struck by a moving truck. The woman brings an action for personal injuries

against the moving company. The complaint alleges that the driver was drunk at the time of the accident and that the moving company was negligent in hiring him and permitting him to drive knowing that he had a drinking problem and convictions for drunk driving. The driver is called as a witness by the moving company and is expected to testify that he was not drunk at the time of the accident. Instead, the driver states on direct examination that he had had several beers as he drove his truck that evening and was under the influence of drugs when his truck struck the woman's car. The counsel for the moving company wants to confront the driver with his deposition testimony that he was completely sober at the time of the accident.
Will this evidence be permitted?
a. No, the statement is hearsay not within any recognized exception.
b. No, the moving company cannot impeach its own witness.
c. Yes, but it may be used only to impeach the driver.
d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.
Social Studies
1 answer:
egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

d. Yes, it can be used to impeach the driver and as substantive evidence that the driver was sober.

Explanation:

The evidence will be permitted to impeach and as substantive evidence. The submission will be used to discredit the statement of the driver especially if it on record that the witness has, on another occasion, made statements that are inconsistent with some material part of his present testimony.

You might be interested in
WeLp urgent pls is for Civics
Scilla [17]

Answer:

is this a virus cuz Im scared

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize the social change protests. Explain in your own words 5 sentences.
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Modern social change protests are a group of sexist and racist individuals who claim that they want to stop those things by showing those things to the "oppressors". For example, the black lives matter movement claims that they want to end racism, but if you actually look at the fact that they intentionally harm the lives of white people and advocate for racism against white people in schools and in society. The Modern feminist movement is now sexist against men, and have pushed for fundamentally sexist rules, even when women, legally have more rights than men in America. The "Anti-Facist" or "Antifa" is a terrorist organization who's entire purpose is to cause harm to anyone with a conservative mindset; this is actually written in their own description. These are examples of "social change" protests that are intentionally cause harm, but there are ones, such as the march for life, that don't cause harm to anyone; instead, they do a lot of good things.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
___________ the perspective that each culture must be understood in terms of the values and ideas of that culture and should not
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Cultural relativism

Explanation:

In sociology, the term cultural relativism refers to the notion that one person or culture believes and practices should be studied and understood based on that own person's culture instead of using other culture criteria to judge it. In other words, it is the idea <u>to understand another culture by its own standards and not by the standards of another culture</u>.

Therefore, we can say that cultural relativism is the perspective that tells us that each culture must be understood in terms of the values and ideas of that culture and should not be judged by standards of another culture.

3 0
4 years ago
1. Elicit how the Abbasids were instrumental in leading the Muslims during the golden age of Islam
Anna [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Spain's proximity to North Africa and its small land border with the Kingdom of Morocco (and Spanish colonial rule in North Africa, which lasted from 1912 to 1975) made the Muslim presence in Spain possible.

7 0
3 years ago
What is secular humanism
Over [174]
Humanism with regard in particular to the belief that humanity is capable of morality and self fulfillment without believing in god
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the physical characteristics of the backcountry affect the movement of settlers.
    12·2 answers
  • A president's group of advisers that helps him or her lead the country is called a
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the british focus their attention on south carolina
    11·1 answer
  • Before you read the chapter, what images came to mind when you thought of Mexico? As you read Carolina’s story, how well did the
    7·1 answer
  • An example of a shared power is to
    8·2 answers
  • What is one reason that congress coins money?
    6·1 answer
  • This quote by Presidential candidate Donald Trump in 2016 reveals his stance as a...
    9·1 answer
  • The glacier given in this picture is an example of which type?
    12·2 answers
  • C
    15·2 answers
  • What was the impact of the Amritsar Massacre?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!