Anwser
I think. yes this is it
Can you give me brainliest plz
Answer:A. Negligence per se.
Explanation:
Negligence Per Se
In common cases of negligence a person suing the other need to give proof of negligence. The plaintiff must give evidence that relate the conduct of the defendant to their damage or harm done to them which shows that the defendant action were the primary cause for that harm.
When a defendant however violates a regulation or municipal ordinance and as a result of that violation someone is harmed this now becomes negligence per se.
Now under negligence per se the defendant's actions are not evaluated to have been reasonable or not but are considered unreasonable since they violated the rule or regulation.
The plaintiff must be under the class protected by that law or regulation and there must evidence of violation of that law by the defendant.
<u>Answer:
</u>
None of the given options are necessarily correct.
Option: (D)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The fluctuations in the rate or amount of production through business are subject to change in the factors of production involved.
- The complications of possibilities presented in the given case can culminate in many varied outputs that cannot be determined clearly.
- Although, it is true that with a change in the degree of involvement of various factors of production, the output is more vulnerable to change.
Idk and Idc
u stupid its YO MAMA
jk its by arguing with the government
