What characteristic of a state did the English colonies NOT possess?

History

1 answer:

saw5 [17]3 years ago

3 0

Sovereignty is the characteristic of a state that the English colonies did NOT possess.

Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme authority over some polity.

The correct answer between all the choices given is the third choice or letter C. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

You might be interested in

Which effect did hosting the World’s Fair in 1984 have on New Orleans?

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

D: New infrastructure was built, leading to a thriving convention business.

Explanation:

One of the most sound legacies of the World's Fair on New Orleans was the construction of Ernest N. Morial Convention Center in 1985, which reopened later as a convention center. Besides, the construction of postmodern building has been remembered fondly by New Orleans.

8 0

4 years ago

Help!!!100 Points!!!

olga2289 [7]

Answer: All of the solae show up in various writings by the Protestant Reformers, but they are not catalogued together by any. In 1916, Lutheran scholar Theodore Engelder published an article titled "The Three Principles of the Reformation: Sola Scriptura, Sola Gratia, Sola Fides" ("only scripture, only grace, only faith").

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Was American foreign policy during the 1800s motivated more by idealism

JulijaS [17]

Yes,
The new policy of territorial expansion was motivated by both idealism and realism.

5 0

3 years ago

What were the daily lives of the black southerners like during the reconstruction?

Elanso [62]

Their lives were almost bad terms like new labor was brought to them to replace the shattered world of slavery. After the civil war, many former slaves, planters and non-slaveholding whites were transformed. Later new systems of labor emerged to take the place of slavery as well, sharecropping..

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use this week's issue of Studies Weekly to help you answer this question. Include the page number and article that helped you fi

Fiesta28 [93]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you do not mention what was your week's issue of Studies Weekly to help you answer this question, we can indeed comment on the reason why some Hindus were polytheistic, while others were monotheistic.

Here we go.

Historians and scholars say that in Hinduism, there is a monotheistic conception of divinity but also a polytheistic pantheon of gods for the following reasons.

There is what we can understand as a monotheistic conception of one god in Hinduism. This concept teaches that there is one great mighty god, Hindus call it Brahman. He is the divine force that created everything. So Hindus believe in this original creative force that gave life to everything.

On the other hand, there is a polytheistic approach to Hinduism in that believes that different deities stem from that great Brahman god. We are talking about deities such as Shiva, Ishvara, Hanuman, Ganesha, Vishnu, Vedi, Krishna, Rama, Durga, and Kali, among many others. Hindu pantheon is extensive.

These many gods represented one aspect of creation and Earth, such as the deity of creation and destruction, a deity for knowledge, a deity of dark, a deity of prosperity, and more.

6 0

3 years ago