Answer:
$778460
Explanation:
Using the highlow method, we calculate the variable cost per unit,
- VC / unit = 855460 - 651960 / 730000 - 545000 = $1.1per unit
- The total fixed cost will be = 855460 - (1.1 * 730000) = $52460
The cost estimating equation will be,
- Total cost at x number of unit = 1.1x + 52460
The cost of manufacturing supplies for the month of July will be,
- Total cost (July) = 1.1(660000) + 52460 = $778460
Answer:
skimming.
Explanation:
In this context, it can be said that Luciana will use the skimming pricing strategy.
This strategy consists of setting a relatively high price for the new product or service that will be offered in the market and then gradually lowering its price.
This strategy works by charging a high initial price that will be accepted by the first customers and after the first demand is satisfied, the price will be reduced to attract the most price sensitive customers.
Answer: The correct answer is B; <em>avoid unethical behavior regardless of the consequences. </em>
Explanation:
When a person uses unethical behavior and doesn't care about the consequences, the person can lose their job. They may also lose all credibility in their community. An employer can lose many things because of this behavior including morale, also credibility, and lose money. By avoiding this behavior, Ryland is doing the right thing even though he may make someone upset.
C. Sherbet.
The citrus's <span>acidic sweetness to clear the taste buds.</span>
Answer:
A) Laws represent the minimum guidelines that companies must follow,whereas a firm's ethical stance may venture beyond the minimum level of compliance.
Explanation:
In the given scenario there are laws that allows community and state police to set up sobriety check points that discourages drunk drivers and saves lives.
The inclusion or removal of applications that helps drunk drivers avoid these checkpoints is not covered by the law. So if a company decides to include such applications it is at their discretion.
Blackberry have chosen to remove applications that helps drunk drivers avoid checkpoints. This is an example of when a company has ventured beyond the minimum level of compliance because of their ethical stance.
Google and Apple however have only ventured beyond the minimum compliance level because they have refused to honour requests by legislators to remove apps that permit smartphone users to navigate around the checkpoints.
