Answer:
B. decision styles are consistent among top managers
Explanation:
Decision making styles differ between managers. Many managers exercise autocratic style which is authoritative wherein very limited inputs from the subordinates are taken and there is little scope for constructive advises.
In heuristic style, the strategies help managers to take clear cut decisions in a prompt manner. In such a form, decisions are arrived at quickly.
Managerial decision making methods differ from manager to manager and are an outcome of managers own judgement and demeanor.
Hence it is evident from above points that decision styles are not consistent among top managers.
Tragic flaw is a literary device that can be defined as a trait in a character leading to his downfall, and the character is often the hero of the literary piece. This trait could be the lack of self-knowledge, lack of judgment, and often it is hubris (pride).
Answer:
a. $17,978
b. $300,000
Explanation:
Conditions
- The cotton country of lancaster, california has owned his home for ten years
- purchased it for $178,000, cotton bought a $160,000 homeowner's insurance policy
- the replacement cost of the home is now $300,000
a. hence,
the proportion of the house insured = 
%
= 89.89%
Percentage amount covered by the policy
= proportion of the house insured = 89.89%
Amount covered by the policy in dollars
= $20,000 × 89.89%
= $17,978
b
Amount of insurance on the home that cotton should now carry to be fully reimbursed for a fire loss = current value of the home
= $ 300,000
Answer:
not satisfying customer needs on critical factors.
Explanation:
In this scenario American companies were supplying more of left hand side cars to Japan. When Japan needed more of the right hand side cars. They ignored the customer needs and instead gave him what he has little use for.
On the other hand Germany supplied Japan the specification of cars that they wanted.
American car manufacturers will be blamed for not satisfying customer needs on critical factor of right hand drive cars.
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Alfred paid in premiums = $18,300
company paid Alfred = $125,000
Alfred died after 18 months, then,
Company collected the face amount of the policy = $150,000
Sale of policy = [ company compensation - premium paid]
= $125,000 - $18,300
= $106,700
In this situation, Alfred receives the submission price from the insurance company consequential in profit.
There is no gain in the income of the insurance policy that is purchased by the Alfred for the long term.
That's why he is not required to include the amount of sale of policy i.e. $106,700.
Hence, Alfred required to include in his gross income will be zero ($0).
