Answer:
a) A moral é a ciência da conduta, enquanto a ética determina padrões de comportamento.
Explanation:
Embora sejam conceitos correlatos, a moral e a ética tem significados diferentes, muito fáceis de serem identificados. Isso porque a moral refere-se aos costumes e hábitos que são defendidos em um determinado povo e nação como correto sob um determinado periodo de tempo. EM resumo, podemos afirmar que a moral é uma ciência da conduta observada como correta, dentro de uma região e dentro de uma cultura.
A ética, por sua vez, refere-se aos comportamentos individuais que os indivíduos de uma região assumem como correto, ou seja, a ética esta diretamente relacionada as ações humanas classificadas como corretas ou incorretas. Em resumo, podemos afirmar que a ética determina os padrões de comportamento.
Anytime you stand up for someone there is going to be an argument, The first thing you need to remember is to keep a check on your emotional intelligence Do not let your emotions rule the conversation. Second, there are 3 parts to an argument. There are 1-reasons, 2-evidence, 3-conclusions, make sure when you rise up to say something that you are prepared to have an educated adult argument.
Example:
There is an opening for a manager position at work. Your coworker Jackson, who is African American, has been working extra hard so he can move up as soon as there is an opening.
Your company stresses non descrimination.
***I am so sorry, I have run out of time. I hope this gets you started or someone else can pick up where I left off. Have a great day.
Answer:
It is a developing country because of its history. Apartheid was there until the 1990s which had restricted development in poorer areas with black communities. Big cities like Johannesburg are great developed places but South Africa is a EDC like India, China etc. so..there is no effect.
<em>The sit and reach test measures flexibility in the hamstrings, the bodie's largest and most commonly injured muscle.</em>
The answer is "<span>b. promoting better relationships with others".
</span>
Evolutionary theories that view depressive indications as versatile neglect to give closefisted clarifications to why even gentle depressive side effects impede wellness significant social working, though hypotheses that propose that misery is maladaptive neglect to represent the high commonness of gloom hazard alleles in human populaces.