Answer:
a. The base-superstructure model.
Explanation:
This conception states that all ideas and social institutions are the superstructure of a material economic base. The social class that controls the means of production in each social system is the ruling class. The superstructure - ideas, currents of thought, culture - reflects the interests of the dominant class. In capitalism, the dominant class is the bourgoisie, the owners of factories (Marx saw and lived in the capitalism of the 19th century). This theory is also called dialectical materialism or historical materialism.
Answer: Buddhism and Hinduism agree on karma, dharma, moksha and reincarnation.
Explanation: They both believe in this so it makes it a true statement of their faith.
Answer:
<em>Well, Your best answer will be is </em><em>D. The Secretary of State. </em><em>Because, The Secretary of State oversees the Department of State, which is the Executive agency that all Ambassadors and Diplomats live under. </em>
<em>Good Luck!~ </em>
<em></em>
<em> </em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
The government policies that the cartoon most likely support is D. Democratic policies reflecting the belief that marketplace regulations are necessary to protect consumers and the environment.
Marketplace regulations are important in order to protect consumers and small businesses. According to the cartoon, we can see the effect of monopoly as illustrated by the monster takeovers.
One of the functions of the government in the marketplace is to regulate business. Therefore, based on the cartoon, marketplace regulations are necessary to protect consumers and the environment.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25327834
Let me say that too often adolescent girls face intersecting disadvantages because of their age, gender, ethnic background, sexual identity, religion affiliation, income, disability among other compounded factors. We have seen pictures, evoked images of girls in different situations that live with disadvantage, even without crisis. The perception and reality of vulnerability arising out of these multiple intersectionalities really creates that context of discrimination and differentiated impact of crisis.
During conflict or humanitarian situations, natural disasters or climate change, these factors exacerbate and disproportionately and differentially affect young women and girls due to neglect of their human rights and the intersecting forms gender-inequality and discrimination that they endure. So this is how we shine the light on this particular situation of girls in emergencies. As was mentioned, it is often forgotten that women and girls are not only helpless victims, they are sources of power, power to cope, power to prevent, power to reduce risk, power for resilience and transformation and to build back better after crisis. That is the power that we want to invoke and tap into.
We must be outraged about the disadvantages that girls still experience. But here has been some progress. Humanitarian actors and governments are much more aware today about addressing crises and resilience building with a gender lens and with a girls lens. But, we still have miles to go.
Imagine that to date, women and children account for more than 75 per cent of the refugees and displaced persons at risk from war, famine, persecution and natural disasters.
Every 10 minutes, somewhere in the world, an adolescent girl dies because of violence.
Up to one-third of adolescent girls report their first sexual experience as being forced and they are victims of sexual violence. Currently at least 133 million girls and women have experienced female genital mutilation.
