Answer:
architectural innovation
Explanation:
The scenario is describing the term known as architectural innovation. This refers to the innovation of the specific architecture of any product that changes and/or modifies the way the different components of the machine link or relate to each other, thus allowing it to perform new functions or the same functions but in a much more user-friendly manner. This is what Canon did by changing the architecture of the copying machine so that it was more user-friendly for the end consumer.
Answer:
Firstly in a long arm resolution, it requires the damage to be occurred inside the state, in the event of individual damage activities.
In the event that the defendant’s executes any business inside the state or agreements anyplace to supply products and enterprises inside the state than the cases emerging from this are amiable to jurisdiction and test for exchange is subjective. Along these lines an agreement of guaranteeing any individual, property inside the state has the option to present locale.
So here, Florida had individual locale over the defendant where the defendant had marked the long haul contract with the offended party. So the Florida law would apply right now, the court discovered there was sufficient to build up close to home locale in Florida as observed by the defendant’s educated and deliberate contacts with Florida partnership.
Answer:
Potter Corporation should turn to activity-based costing.
Explanation:
Potter Corporation should change to activity-based costing. Since Its present system seems to be deforming product costs, resulting in prices of specialty products that are below average and prices of simple products that are too high. This may lead Potter to push products that produce low profit margins.
The correct answer is: Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
INTERPRETATION
If an advertiser doesn’t want to add remarketing tags to a website then Customer Match would be a good fit for them because Customer Match creates a similar audience for you by using the data from your ad accounts and campaigns. This makes the Customer Match data reliable because it uses your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
The Customer Match audience is created from the interests and behavior of the audience similar to your previous website visitors.
Therefore, we can conclude that the correct option is D. If an advertiser doesn’t want to add remarketing tags to a website then Customer Match would be a good fit for them because Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was:
If an advertiser doesn't want to add remarketing tags to a website, why would Customer Match be a good fit for them?
a. Customer Match allows you to reach people who have been to your website
b. Customer Match allows you to reach people who haven’t been to your website yet
c. It wouldn’t be a good fit. You have to tag your website to use Customer Match
d. Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag
Learn more about Remarketing on:
brainly.com/question/27692394
#SPJ4