Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
Answer:
correct option is B: $29,000
Explanation:
given data
apartments = 15
family homes = 45
office buildings = 25
pay for cleaning staff = $12.50/hour
solution
we get here Total Budgeted hours that is
type Number Hrs/Clean No of Cleans Total Hours
Apartments 15 4 4 240
Homes 45 6 4 1080
Office 25 10 4 1000
Total Budgeted hours need per month 2320
Budgeted cost per month that is 12.50/hrs so it will 29000
so correct option is B: $29,000
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
I think this is important without a doubt . You might need to use that money someday for yourself but won't have it because you spent it on a HUGE list of groceries. If you put some money aside for yourself, you will have money that your allowed to do anything with (saving, buying clothes, buying cars, etc.) You should always save some of your payment that way you always have extra money in case of any money emergenies or such.
The answer is: by cheap foreign labor
Currently, most of the corporations that operates in america manufacture their products in countries such as China, india, indonesia, phillipines, or Eastern European countries.
People who live in those countries typically have lower standard of living. Because of this, they can agree in receiving salary that are considerably lower compared to the minimum wage in united states.
