1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alinara [238K]
3 years ago
11

Does document A corroborate the text book account

History
1 answer:
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
6 0

Please give me more info and I will edit my response!


Thank you! I'd love to help! :)

You might be interested in
Which best describes Japan's policy during WW2.
Finger [1]
I think it is eather a or b
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the advantages of being an incumbent candidate
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

1. Well known

Holding an elected office, whether it’s a Senator or local PTA President, bestows upon the owner a certain amount of prominence among their constituents. When it comes time to vote, name recognition is one of the primary benefits of incumbency, especially in more obscure races. This association is often enough to overcome challenges from more obscure rivals.

2. Institutional Support

By running from within the system, officials can use many of the advantages that come with their office. Interest groups and other supporters are much more likely to get behind someone with a proven track record of responding to their needs than an unknown challenger. Also, there are many tools and resources available to office holders through the system of support behind the organization, like voter databases as well as contact information, that can be used to their advantage.

3. Fund Raising

Connections with powerful constituencies and the power to influence decisions on their behalf often allows incumbents to raise far more money than those who are working from outside the system. Historical precedent and data confirms that elected officials are often able to out raise and spend their opponents in races that require fund raising.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How would things have been different if other European countries had reacted to Hitler's aggressive tactics towards Austria and
STALIN [3.7K]

Haha I was djdklapambz

Explanation:

najjsbhsbuskoanehdvnsks

6 0
3 years ago
According to the kansas nebraska act
OleMash [197]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure that it is  - It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders.

Explanation:

Hope this helped.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hey, I need help :<br> farmers refused to do what in 1794<br> Thanks
timofeeve [1]
Move west because they couldn't pass the mississippi and thought the soil would be bad for farming
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • America elected Ronald Reagan to the presidency in 1980. What was the appeal of this man? Why was Reagan one of the most popular
    8·1 answer
  • Which US president was involved in the creation of the Panamá Canal?
    8·1 answer
  • The economic program of the Soviet Union as displayed in the source was achieved primarily through
    6·2 answers
  • 2.<br> What restriction was placed on the extension of slavery by the Missouri <br> Compromise?
    13·2 answers
  • Who was Winston Churchill?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following most directly led to the start of the First World War
    9·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the United States government system with the systems of other countries.
    12·1 answer
  • The Western and Eastern Empires both fell to the Goths <br><br> True or False
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Americans oppose the changing role of women
    9·2 answers
  • During the Great War, women also contributed to the war's victory by
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!