Answer:
The advocate general is appointed by the governor. He must be a person who is qualified to be appointed a judge of a high court. ... He holds office during the pleasure of the governor. This means that he may be removed by the governor at any time.
Answer:
C. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The case of Marbury v. Madison determined the power that the judicial branch of the government can have to limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.
Prior to the case, the congress can basically pass any laws that they want without any repercussion.
The case granted the Supreme court with the power of judicial review. This enable the supreme court to examine every laws proposed by Congress before its passed. The supreme court can rejected the proposal and prevented it from becoming actual law if it violated any part of the constitutions.
Answer:
Risky behavior is not controlled behavior in which the person suffers and is not feeling well.
There are personal values that assist a person in overcoming barriers regarding risky behavior. Two of them are:
1. Stable personality and self-security will help a person overcome problems and barriers in her/his life.
2. Responsibility and rationality will also lead to success in overcoming problems
But also skill are important.
Answer:
b. dualistic thinking
Explanation:
Dualistic thinking -
It is the method of thinking , where both the aspect of any person or thing is considered, i.e. , both the good and bad aspect , is known as dualistic thinking.
This method enables the person to think in both the way while making any decision,
Hence, from the question , the correct term according to the given information of the question , is dualistic thinking.
Answer:
In <u>New Jersey v. TLO</u>, he U.S. Supreme Court rules that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on <u>reasonable doubt/ suspicion</u>.
Explanation:
In New Jersey's Piscataway High School, a teacher discovered a student and her friend smoking cigarettes in the school lavatory which was a clear violation of the school rules. So, when the students were taken to the Principal's office and searched, they found other "illegal" items in her bag. The family of the TLO took the school to court, stating that it is illegal for them to conduct a search without a warrant. But when the court looked over the case, decided that for the greater interest of the safety of the school and of the individual, the school has the right to conduct warrantless searches at school based on "reasonable suspicion". This is in accordance to her denial of ever smoking but the discovery of the cigarettes in her pure said otherwise. Moreover, she was taken directly from the lavatory where she was caught on the act and thus, her claims were trashed.
Thus, the <u>court ruled in the New Jersey v. TLO case,school officials can conduct warrantless searches if they have reasonable doubt/ suspicion of any illegal activities within the school’s premises.
</u>
