Excess aggregate demand (AD)
Quick economic growth.
Answer:
Weeks of supply = 4.16 weeks
Explanation:
given data
net income = $20 million
revenue = $60 million
cost of goods sold = $25 million
inventory = $2 million
property, plant, and equipment = $500,000
to find out
how many weeks of supply does the firm hold
solution
we know here that Weeks of supply will be express as
Weeks of supply = 
× 52 weeks ....................................1
so put here value we get weeks of supply
Weeks of supply = 
× 52 weeks
Weeks of supply = 4.16 weeks
Answer:
Bank A should be chosen.
Explanation:
Given:
Effective annual rate (EAR) of bank A = 10%
Bank B pays 9% compounded daily. EAR of bank B is calculated below:
EAR = 
Where, i is 0.09
n is compounding period that is 365 (since it is compounded daily)
EAR = 
= 1.0942 - 1
= 0.0942 or 9.42%
Bank B pays EAR of 9.42%
Based on EAR, Bank A should be selected as it pays higher EAR of 10%.
Other things remain the same if the average aggregate inventory value goes down, then the inventory turnover ratio will go up, but weeks of supply will go down.
An inventory valuation allows a company to provide a monetary value for items that make up its inventory. Inventories are usually the largest current asset of a business, and proper measurement of them is necessary to assure accurate financial statements.
An inventory valuation is a monetary amount associated with the goods in the inventory at the end of an accounting period.
learn more about inventory value here
brainly.com/question/14168493
#SPJ4
The still-face interaction paradigm
<span>An experimental task was introduced in 1978 to prove that infants actively contribute to social interaction. It is called the Still-Face Paradigm or SFP.</span>
<span>In the experiment, 3 phases of face-to-face interaction of infants with an adult were tested: the normal interaction, the still-face (where the adult becomes unresponsive and maintains a neutral facial expression), and a reunion where the adult resumes normal interaction.</span>
<span>Indeed, the still-face paradigm showed effects like increased gaze aversion and less smiling. </span>
