Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that

Question

3 years ago

12

Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that

metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist’s results and conclusion?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Rudik [331] · Answer 1 · 2022-05-05T05:37:47+03:00

Answer:

<h2>That doesn't mean a diverse group of many different organisms could live that way.</h2>

Explanation:

First of all, this is a theory, nothing else. This means that they are no strong evidence and events that support this. Another important point is that scientists discover a type of BACTERIA, nothing else, which means that the living organism with this nature is unicellular, it's not a complex organism like multicellular. However, they conclude that a DIVERSE GROUP can live without oxygen, which is a lie, they are speculating.