Answer:
The author points to Levitt and Smith, as well as Marshll as inspirations for using numbers to investigate problems because:
they made efort to connect their works with real world problems.
Thinking like them offer to sports analysis
That numbers will sometimes disprove conventional wisdom
Explanation:
The studies on sports efficacy under economical and statistical models to obtain a coefficient of price over win is a revolutionary approach to calculate the number of resources a team needs to use to win. This approach has managed to find efficacy in teams as a whole and the contribution of players in the system as an effective system. It has enhanced analysts and researchers the ability to understand when the team can use its resources in its best way. This has left behind conventional wisdom on players and teams to bring statistical approaches and knowledge based on deductions to find efficacy in real-world sports problems.
Answer:
As a result, the population will be decreased.
Explanation:
Immigration is act of living in another country in which people will be residents of their destination country in which they don't have any nationalism and they want to live there permanently for employment purpose and permanently residential purpose.
Emigration is the act of leaving the own country to take reside elsewhere in another country for employment or permanently residential purposes.
Emigration is a process or act or movement from their own country to another.
Hence Immigration and emigration both will impact the population by reducing it.
Answer:
The correct answer is designing the survey so that subjects are not forced to answer one question before going to the next.
Explanation:
When talking about an investigation of sensitive and controversial issues, the investigator has to have the tact to obtain the necessary information from the participants, whereby so that you can use different strategies.
In this case, giving the option to pass the question to the participant if he does not feel ready to answer it allows him to return to it if he is prepared at some time while answering the survey. So the researcher can be sure that the information does not is biased.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
The awsner is the knights of labor
If this was the year 2000 AD, the number of years ago that would have seen the date being 1500 AD is a. 500 years ago.
<h3>How many years ago was 1500 AD. </h3>
As both the year 2000 and 1500 are denoted AD, the difference in years can be found as:
= Current year - Past year
Solving gives:
= 2000 - 1500
= 500 years
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more on the yearly denomination at brainly.com/question/17411523.
