Answer:
Germany
Explanation:
Tennis rackets are in a way, a luxury item that is only often bought by people who enjoy a middle-high, or high income. This is because Tennis as a whole tends to be an expensive sport to practice, since most tennis courts are located in private clubs, need to be rented for the practice, and the rest of the equipment associated with the sport: the footwear, and even the clothing, tends to be expensive as well.
For this reason, I would target a high income country first, and the most straightforward proxy to measure the average income of a nation is its GDP Per Capita, which is the GDP divided by the total population of the country.
According to the CIA Factbook, we have the following GDP Per Capita figures for the countries listed:
Brazil: $15,600
China: $18,200
Germany: $53,209
Italy: $38,200
Japan: $42,900
As a result, I would choose Germany, because it has the highest GDP per capita among the lot.
Answer:
Contribution margin per unit= $12.85
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials$ 7.05
Direct labor$ 4.20
Variable manufacturing overhead$ 1.55
Sales commissions $ 1.15
Variable administrative expense$ 0.40
<u>To calculate the contribution margin, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Contribution margin per unit= selling price - total unitary variable cost
Contribution margin per unit= 27.2 - (7.05 + 4.2 + 1.55 + 1.15 + 0.4)
Contribution margin per unit= $12.85
<span>The simple answer here is you never want to over commit any part of your portfolio. Every single successful investor has a wide variety of investment holdings. This is known as diversification. If you place all of your "eggs in one basket," so to speak, if that investment were to play against you, your losses may be much higher than anticipated or often irrecoverable. With a diverse portfolio, when one small portion of your investment strategy fails, you can count on other, more successful aspect to make up the difference.</span>
Answer:
The options chosen are:
B. the tragedy of the commons;
C. incentive to conserve the property;
E. incentive to protect the property.
Explanation:
<em> B. The tragedy of the commons- </em>Open-access regimes can be exploited on a first-come, first-served basis, because no individual or group has the legal power to restrict access. The consequences of open access have become popularly known as what Hardin (1968) misleadingly called ‘the Tragedy of the Commons.’
<em>C. incentive to conserve the property:</em> In addition, clearly defining and assigning property rights should resolve environmental problems by internalising externalities and relying on incentives for private owners to conserve resources for the future.
<em>E.</em> The Incentive to protect the property -<em> </em><em>The incentives associated with private property rights can help conserve scarce resources: Private ownership entails penalties for premature harvesting or over-harvesting of resources. Private ownership rewards community and individual cooperation. Private ownership rewards conservation and stewardship behaviour.</em>
<em />
