1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetach [21]
3 years ago
13

Sarah smith works as a laser technician for a local dermatology center consisting of physicians operating under a partnership ag

reement. sarah purchased supplies through the mail from a medical supply facility totaling $5,000. she signed the contract agreeing to pay for the supplies in her name, sarah smith. a few weeks later the dermatologists became embroiled in a bitter dispute regarding profits and terminated the partnership. unfortunately, the partners were not aware of the debt owed to the medical supply facility; and the bill remained unpaid. sarah received a bill from the supply company for $5,000. is she liable to the medical supply company, and why or why not?
Business
1 answer:
ser-zykov [4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Yes, Sarah is liable for the $5,000 bill since she ordered the supplies and signed the contract using her own name.

She is responsible for the money owed to the medical supply facility, but if this purchase practice was common and happened before, she can also demand that the former partners pay her back.

You might be interested in
At October 1, Arcade Fire Enterprises reported stockholders' equity of $70,000. During October, no stock was issued and the comp
viva [34]

Answer:

$10,000

Explanation:

As provided no equity is issued, therefore,

Common stock + Net income = Stockholder's equity

We know common stock = $70,000

Further there might be some dividend paid, which shall be deducted from net income to compute total value of Stockholder's equity.

Therefore,

$70,000 + $18,000 - Dividend = $78,000

$88,000 - $78,000 = Dividend = $10,000

Therefore, dividends paid during the month = $10,000

5 0
3 years ago
Necesito un susario de la uanl de aspirante con admisión rechazada
max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

ta bueno pue

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Offer. Ball writes to Sullivan and inquires how much Sullivan is asking for a specific forty-acre tract of land Sullivan owns. B
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

Ball can certainly hold Sullivan to a contract for sale of the land.  Sullivan in his reply to Ball's enquiry offered to sell the forty-acre tract of land at $60,000 and nothing less.  Ball accepted this offer by Sullivan by stating his acceptance.

These exchanges of offer and acceptance meet the terms of a valid contract.  Therefore, Ball can always hold Sullivan for contract enforcement.

Explanation:

In making a valid contract, offer and acceptance are key ingredients, with specific consideration.  Since the two parties, Ball and Sullivan are agreed on the consideration and have exchanged offer and acceptance, the validity of the contract is enhanced thereupon.

7 0
3 years ago
When Matt Sawyer talks about giving kids a good experience early so they are more likely to come back when they "get wheels" (me
Lunna [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": Psychological–learning.

Explanation:

Psychological learning refers to the behavior individuals acquire based on their experiences, negative or positive. It is believed events of individuals' childhood shape their personalities in the future and their attitudes in front of different situations. The school of study in charge of studying behavior is called Behaviorism.

5 0
3 years ago
Joe sold gold coins for $1,000 that he bought a year ago for $1,000. He says, "At least I didn't lose any money on my financial
sergejj [24]

Answer:

B) opportunity costs.

Explanation:

Opportunity cost is the fortified benefits when a choice is made. It is the sacrificed option from a  variety of possible choices. The value of opportunity cost is expressed as the cost of the next best alternative.

According to the economist, Joe made a loss because his opportunity cost would have yielded a better return. In evaluating the viability of a project, economists always consider the returns from the next best alternative. Joe would have made a profit if the returns from the sales of gold were higher than the 3 percent from a certificate of deposit.  Because Joe opted for the gold, he missed the chance to earn from the certificate of deposit. In economics, he made a loss.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Marina Manufacturing is considering buying new equipment for its factory. The new equipment will reduce variable labor costs but
    12·1 answer
  • Martin Enterprises needs someone to supply it with 120,000 cartons of machine screws per year to support its manufacturing needs
    5·1 answer
  • Customers today want separate prices for each service element, and they also want the right to select the elements they want. Cu
    15·1 answer
  • Dupont has an advertisement that shows police officers describing how they were shot at close range in the line of duty. the adv
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following factors cause a decline to both price and the quantity being sold?An increase in demand No change in dema
    11·1 answer
  • Jack McAdams' team feels frustrated. They had forwarded many viable ideas to management for work process improvements. They were
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a primary responsibility of the Federal Reserve Bank?
    14·2 answers
  • North Inc. is a calendar-year C corporation, accrual-basis taxpayer. At the end of year 1, North accrued and deducted the follow
    11·1 answer
  • Using the liquidity-preference model, the Federal Reserve can react to the threat of exceedingly high inflation via monetary pol
    11·1 answer
  • The unemployment rate is the percentage of the: Group of answer choices population that is unemployed. adult population that is
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!