The career and work path the person wants to follow defines the individual as vocational/career identity.
A consistent pattern of interests, objectives, skills, and talents is reflected in one's vocational identity. A solid framework for a person's work and career histories can be found in their objectives, interests, and goals.
As a result of occupational and self-exploration and dedication moulded by personal traits and social context throughout childhood and adolescence, vocational identity goes through a series of developmental modifications.
A career identity is a system of associations that relates a person's motivations, interests, and skills to appropriate job roles.
To learn more about career identity here
brainly.com/question/21600784
#SPJ4
Answer:
The way I see this is less a question on whether or not democracy is good, but whether it's within suitable boundaries to work correctly. The overarching state exists to keep a certain order, and, if someone is to see that status quo as bad, they often won't see a point to voting. If you agree don't think this, you should engage in discussion with them about the current status quo. If you do, you should try to find the least bad candidate if you choose to vote, while focusing on actions outside of a ballot.
In considering how to respond, you should recognize the feelings of Mrs. White in which she feels despair and guilt that was evident on her statement. It is best to recognize her feelings, have an empathy towards her feelings and to find a best way that will suitable reply that will not offend the other party.
I believe the answer would be, "Posture".
Answer:
language constructs our perception of reality
Explanation:
Sapir-Whorf is also known as the hypothesis of linguistic reality, It explains that human language structure affects the way he perceive things. The language of a person can influence how life issues are been perceived.
There are two hypothesis to this,
Stronger hypothesis it was in place by early linguist before the beginning of world war two it says human thought is a function of his language.
Weaker hypothesis was upheld by modern linguistics it says that language can only influence our thoughts and decisions we make.