There is no solution you can’t use > in an equation that’s absolutely absurd.
Answer:
<h3>-12 + 25 </h3>
As it is given in the question that 12° F is below zero is it is taken as minus and 25 °F is risen so it is taken as positive
( a ) The null hypothesis, represented by
, should be equivalent to 0.6 pounds per square inch, considering it normally is predicted to be equivalent to the population parameter, which, in this case, is 0.6 psi ( pounds per square inch. ) The alternative hypothesis on the other hand contradicts the null hypothesis, and as the manager feels the pressure has been reduced, the alternative hypothesis points that the pressure is less than 0.6 psi -

<em>stigma is represented by the sign ( σ )</em>
( b ) Now if you were to reject the null hypothesis when true, that would lead to a type I error. That would mean that to reject the fact that σ = 0.7, and accept that σ < 0.7, even though σ = 0.7 is true, would make a type I error.
_______
( c ) A type II error is quite the opposite. Accepting the null hypothesis while rejecting the alternative hypothesis would make a type II error.
Answer:
LOL its too late to be doin work if i was you i wouldve stopped doin that work
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option B
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The volume of the cone is equal to

where
Bc is the area of the circle of the base of the cone
The volume of the square pyramid is equal to

where
Bp is the area of the square base of the pyramid
we know that

substitute in the formula of volume of the cone


Remember that

substitute
----> StartFraction pi Over 4 EndFraction the volume of the pyramid
or
----> StartFraction pi Over 4 EndFraction (StartFraction (2 r) squared (h) Over 3 EndFraction)
or
----> One-thirdπr^2h