1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ch4aika [34]
3 years ago
7

A woman was standing in the aisle of a subway car and put her purse on the seat next to her. A man approached the woman from beh

ind and grabbed the purse off the seat. He then pushed the woman out of the way and ran out of the subway car while carrying the purse. The man was apprehended on the subway platform while in possession of the purse. In a jurisdiction that follows the common law with respect to criminal offenses, of what crime can the man properly be convicted?
Law
1 answer:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

assault

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Evaluate the noor mukadam case in light of physiological perspective
olga2289 [7]

Therapy Works, a counselling and psychotherapy service, on Tuesday issued a statement against the "baseless and false allegations" it said were being levelled against it following the gruesome killing of Noor Mukadam in Islamabad.

5 0
3 years ago
How are criminal cases different from civil cases?
LiRa [457]

Answer:

d or b is answer but i am confuse

7 0
2 years ago
Which is true about Plato’s Five Regimes of human government?
Goryan [66]

Answer:

Jesus loves you

3 0
3 years ago
The underlying principle behind the principle of stair decisis is _
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis.

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.

Stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law.

4 0
3 years ago
If a court has jurisdiction over a legal dispute, what is
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

B.  The court is authorized to hear the case and make a  ruling after considering the arguments.

Explanation:

The jurisdiction in legal terms refers to the geographical coverage or reach of a case to be tried, heard, and decide on the matter. This means that cases of any legal matter are tried according to their jurisdictional situations.

In cases of a court that has jurisdiction over a legal dispute, the court is at the liberty to hear and decide on the matter. The court can hear the case and make a ruling after all arguments are presented. The jurisdiction allows the court to act on the case as it likes. This means that the court has the right to make any ruling regarding the case as it has jurisdiction over it.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher will
    12·2 answers
  • Heidi Klum has decided to produce and sell a signature fragrance. Klum spends countless hours with a bottle manufacturer coming
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! (Will Mark Brainliest!)
    8·1 answer
  • The Utah Code Annotated was written in what year?​
    9·1 answer
  • How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?
    6·2 answers
  • If you get more than 18 points on your licenses within 18 months, you will lose your license for 90 days
    7·2 answers
  • What’s the worst punishment 12yr. can get if he drinks underage? (by the way i do nit refer to me as the 12yr, just asking p.s.
    12·2 answers
  • IF YOU WANT TO TURN LEFT FROM A DRIVEWAY ONTO A ROAD WITH A
    7·2 answers
  • Other than the title of why there are issues with minorities mistrust of the police. what other kinds of details is needed to do
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 ?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!