Explanation:
1. his thoughts dont really line up with that of the republican party. he aligns up with the progressive part most often they don't really favor taxes being on the wealthy individuals and corporations. other than the last part its seems to be republican ideal beliefs
2. I think he might be more of a liberal than a conservative. one thing i found was that liberals tend to want more government regulation in a market than that of a conservative."Liberal
: A market system in which government regulates the economy is best. Government must protect citizens from the greed of big business. Unlike the private sector, the government is motivated by public interest. Government regulation in all areas of the economy is needed to level the playing field."
Your first answer is the right answer
Florence was the site of many economic developments. It was witness to new systems of taxation and borrowing during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Trade was a major source of economic success. Moreover, industry was strong due to the implementation of craft guilds. Florence was not dominated by royal courts, like other states. Instead, it was a republic with an elected government. This made the city more frugal in taste, which also meant that the behaviour of people in terms of wealth accumulation and saving was more moderate and humble, contributing to the thriving economy.
English and French Kingdoms had both similarities and differences, during the late 1600's.
Both had a monarchical system, with a king ruling the country.
However, France had been under the rule of Louis XIV for over 60 years by the end of the 17th century, thus, he had consolidated his power, and the crown's power above everything. He eliminated the remnants of feudalism still left across France and imposed a rule of absolute monarchy.
In contrast to the English kingdom, where the parliament was powerful enough to denounce King James II for abuse of power through the use of the Bill of Rights, and was a solid institution with the authority to depose the king if needed. The English kingdom had clear limits on the Crown's power and authority, and several tax and civil right laws could not be emitted without the Parliaments permission.
