The information that's given in the question regarding irrational thinking relates to all-or nothing thinking.
A cognitive distortion refers to an exaggerated thought pattern involved in depression and anxiety. These thoughts make people perceive reality inaccurately.
Regarding the question, irrational thinking is an example of the cognitive distortion known as all-or nothing thinking. It simply means thinking in extremes.
Learn more about irrational thinking on:
brainly.com/question/1252140
Answer:
The answer is A : Scholars believe that greater access to political information may explain why young Americans are more liberal than their parents on many social issues.
Explanation:
Political Socialization is a lifelong process by which an individual's view on politics is shaped by his/her social circles.
Social circles such as the family, cycle of friends, educational institutions and the media act as agents of socialization and all play key roles in shaping one's political perspectives and values.
That said, the role of the American family in shaping political views is dwindling as most American parents hardly talk to and educate their children on political matters except of course if the child is born into the home of a politician .
With the advent of the internet and social media as well as globalization, political information is readily available to young adults, giving them options in making their informed decisions especially if they believe that the views of their parents or teachers is biased.
Thus the internet creates a platform that makes political and social information readily available enabling them to be more liberal and flexible in their opinions than their parents on a myriad of social issues.
Those subsequent actions are called: <span>Secondary deviance
Secondary deviance is a process of integrating wrong doings into the concept that validate the actions/behavior.
When the student labeled as a drop-out, he/she will phone to get a validation for al other bad behaviors consistent to that label.
</span>
This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
Law, Nation/ country, State, National. I hope this helped!