Answer:
According to Locke, civil and religious matters should remain separate because, although freedom of religion is an individual right, it is not necessarily a political issue.
Reasoning:
John Locke’s theory of religious liberty to elucidate the individual’s right of
religious belief and worship, as well as the origins, extent, and limitations
of that right. Although freedom of religion is an individual right,
it is not necessarily a political issue.
I hope this helps!
Please Rate & Thank!
Please mark as Brainliest!
Have a wonderful day! : )
Answer:
a unit of heredity which is transferred from a parent to offspring and is held to determine some characteristic of the offspring
Explanation:
Answer
With Cattle.
Explanation
Aryan was ancient people specifically called Indo-Iranian from areas around Caspian Sea. There great influence was on the formation of ancient Indian-Iran relationship .This group of individuals existed during the times when there was no writing thus most of their history was not documented. Economically, Aryan raised cattle, sheep and goats though they also farmed crops for trade with other tribes. The most vital indicator of wealth was Cattle and the more the number of cattle possessed by a family the more wealthy the family was, thus the cattle was later made illegal to be killed because of its importance.
Have A Wonderful Day !!
Answer:
The researchers found that <em>adolescents are more likely to take risks and exhibit risky decision making in a driving task when in the presence of peers than when alone compared to their adult counterparts.</em>
Explanation:
This was determined by Gardner and Steinberg (2005) during a study of adults and adolescents risk taking in a driving task.It was found that social influence is a factor which also determines risk taking especially in adolescents. The study gave credence to the notion that peer influence plays a role in adolescents risky behavior and the impulse to take risks.
The answer seems best to me is D) Conservatives.
Most Conservatives prefer justices who will interpret the law in a strict constructionist manner.
