1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
5

In your opinion, have Supreme Court interpretations of free speech changed over time? If so, how? Give examples.

Law
2 answers:
bearhunter [10]3 years ago
7 0
I think the Supreme Courts interpretations of free speech have become more libertarian over time. For example, free speech on LGBT matters would have been strictly prohibited a century ago.
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
5 0
Free speech has definitely changed over time, examples of this is racism, explicit words, and hate speech getting censored or illegal. They change interpretations because everyone keeps saying things that get put into a good or bad category and they try to keep censorship under control.
You might be interested in
When is a statement against interest also a hearsay?
andre [41]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.

And statements are usually made in court.

Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.

is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules

3 0
3 years ago
The rights of people accused of a crime are protected in the Bill of Rights. Choose ALL true statements about how the Bill of Ri
goblinko [34]

Answer:

B, C and D

Explanation:

C is Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures ( amendment 4)

D is- Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases (Amendment 6)

B is- public trial by an impartial jury (amendment 5)

A is not covered under the BoR

E: you can be searched if there is probable cause

6 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the practice whereby the prosecutor
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

Plea bargaining

Explanation:

Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors in which defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors.

4 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
Olegator [25]

Answer:

C and A

Explanation:

the other 2 have no relation to forensics

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What crime is committed by anyone (adult) who shall kill a child three years old?
jok3333 [9.3K]
Manslaughter maybe. im not sure
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • There was a thunderstorm in your area and the power went out.
    9·2 answers
  • Does the law say anything about a search warrant for investigative journalists
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between The Military Court of Vietnam and The Court of Criminal Appeals Vietnam?
    8·1 answer
  • What are the roles and responsibilities of the queen in Canada?
    10·1 answer
  • You are a forensic scientist about to enter one of two parallel universes: in one, you will be unable to use physics in any of y
    14·1 answer
  • The higher the percentage of black officers on the police force the higher the arrest rate for crimes such as assault true or fa
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think it is fair that men between 17 and 25 still need to register for the Selective Service Act in 2021?
    5·1 answer
  • The united states has always had laws to protect children
    11·2 answers
  • A police officer is struggling to arrest a man who has just assaulted a shopkeeper you see the police officer kneeling on the de
    10·2 answers
  • According to the United States Supreme Court, how did Ollie's Barbecue engage in interstate commerce?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!