Please give me a thanks! The two types of changes that national boundaries experience on a regular basis include small changes and drastic changes. A small change may be something as simple as a river shifting direction and moving over 50 feet. This would be a small change in a nation-state's boundary
Answer:
Predictive validity.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests with the Psychology Aptitude Test (PAT) scoring system; the predictive validity is a way of calculating how a determined score on a test predicts scores on a certain criterion measure. In other words, this is a correlation between tests and ratings; as shown in the example provided by the exercise: "Their scores were later compared to their performance in the introductory psychology course, and high scores on the PAT were related to high grades in the course".
Answer:
False
Explanation:
<u>There is no setting that is always absolutely preferable for the praise of the performance. The setting which you chose to praise the performance of the person depends more on you, the policy, the situation and the purpose. </u>
Sometimes, you are in need of quick or long-distance praise, so you should write the message.
Another time, a person did a great teamwork job or has to lead the team well, so you will want to praise them in public and in the presence of the team.
If you are giving long, detailed feedback on the performance, you will want to praise them in person and to make it the center of the conversation and as personal as possible.
The correct answer is The map shows that nuclear missiles launched from Cuba could strike almost anywhere in the United States.
Explanation: In this case the map is showing missiles from Cuba and how they were powerful, so powerful that it was possible to strike almost all the US with it.
The correct answer here would be the third option.
The Enlightenment movement and its supporters placed the highest value on the reason itself and they therefore challenged the established and traditional beliefs that were dominant at the time. The idea that people had fundamental rights that no government could break were critical for the future development of nations as was the idea that the government was for the people and the people had the right to chose their government.