Long-Grained rice. Hope this helps:)
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
Subsidized direct loan provides interest subsidy meaning department of education pays your interest while.
<h3>What is loan?</h3>
The term loan refers to a type of credit vehicle in which a sum of money is lent to another party in exchange for future repayment of the value or principal amount. In many cases, the lender also adds interest and/or finance charges to the principal value which the borrower must repay in addition to the principal balance. Loans come in many different forms. There are a number of factors that can differentiate the costs associated with them along with their contractual terms. Interest rates have a significant effect on loans and the ultimate cost to the borrower. Loans with higher interest rates have higher monthly payments or take longer to pay off than loans with lower interest rates.
Learn more about loan, refer:
brainly.com/question/22594723
#SPJ4
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
9.11
xplanation:㏒
The coinsurance amount is 9.11.
Birthday of the dependent child is 1939-1945.
Date to play a claim is 1914-1918
Primary and secondary policy holders is 7/11.
<h2>Hope this helps! (: STAY SAFE AND BLESSED </h2>
