If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, what reasoning is most likely underlying her argument?

Business

1 answer:

mylen [45]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:

Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.

Explanation:

The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.

You might be interested in

Do personal profits earned directly as a result of one partner's connection with the partnership belong to the firm:_________

sergejj [24]

Answer:

Explanation: The key word is it was earned as result of the connection to the firm so it is split between the partners

8 0

3 years ago

Sarah, the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees. Her boss, Vladimir, instructs her to increase the

Verizon [17]

Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.

We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.

We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.

4 0

3 years ago

The confirmation of customers' accounts receivable rarely provides reliable evidence about the completeness assertion because:__

vlada-n [284]

Answer:d

Explanation:maybe

6 0

2 years ago

Match each of the following contract principles to the statement that best fits it: A. bargained-for exchange of value to the pa

AnnZ [28]

Answer:D.both parties to the contract agree on the contract terms

A.bargained-for exchange of value to the parties

C.parties' negotiated understanding of terms and intent that lead to the contract

B. the subject matter of the contract does not violate law or public policy

Explanation:D A C B 1.consideration

D A C B 2.mutal Acceptance

D A C B 3. Legality

D A C B 4. Agreement

8 0

3 years ago

In a shoe manufacturing plant, all shoes undergo the same operations in the same sequence. the shoes flow from one workstation t

andre [41]

The answer is product layout. In manufacturing engineering, this talk about to a manufacture system where the work locations and apparatus are situated beside the line of production, as with assemblage lines. Generally, work units are stirred along a line (not essentially a geometric line, but a set of consistent work stations) by a conveyor.

6 0

3 years ago