Answer:
putable bond
Explanation:
According to my research on different financial investments, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being described is called a puttable bond. Like mentioned in the question this is a bond in which entitles the bondholder to return or redeemed the bond to the issuer on specified dates before its maturity date.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
quick ratio = 0.72
Explanation:
given data
sales = $200 million
inventory turnover ratio = 5.0
current assets totaled = $100 million
current ratio = 1.2
solution
we get here quick ratio so here
inventory turnover ratio = 
...............1
put here value
inventory = 
inventory = 40
and
now we get current liability
current ratio = 
...............2
put here value
current liability = 
current liability = 83.33
and here quick ratio
quick ratio = 
.............3
quick ratio = 
quick ratio = 0.72
Answer:
This proposition isn't socially alluring. On the off chance that regular monopolists are permitted to decide their benefit amplifying yields and costs, at that point the yield of the common monopolist would in any case be at the problematic level where cost surpasses minor expense, demonstrating an under-designation of assets to the item.
It would be progressively alluring to constrain the normal monopolist to charge a value equivalent to minor cost and sponsor any misfortunes. Reasonable return valuing, that is, setting value equivalent to Average Total Cost would be an improvement over this proposition. The imposing business model firm could gain ordinary benefit by settling on reasonable return valuing proposition.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: assess sponsor capability.
Explanation:
To begin with, the project managers must take care of every step necessary in order to obtain the best results as possible that the team is looking for, therefore that in order to do that task, the project manager must undertake the activities of assess the individual and team capability of the project and due to the fact that certain standards must been followed then obviously there is the need of establishing a team ground rules (team charter). In the other side, the project manager can assess the capability of the sponsor but if the company can not change of sponsor then there is nothing that he can do, therefore that that activity is not completely necessary.
