These were less than positive between the two to say the least
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Your income probably cannot make loan payments.
Explanation:
Even if the bank sees that Verónica has a perfect track record in past loans, it is possible that she will be denied the loan, since Verónica's monthly income will not be enough to pay the loan.
Since she should pay 900 dollars a month, and her salary is 1100 dollars, this would leave Veronica with $ 200 remaining that would be insufficient to pay her monthly expenses. So the bank when making the calculations of the monthly expenses of the person considers that he does not have the income that allows him to pay the loan on a monthly basis.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
The best evaluation would be that the statement is invalid because we cannot be sure if the argument is referring to the same <span>provost. The whole paragraph is a fallacy. It was not directly stated that James Hoopster was the provost who saved the university from crisis. It just so happened that James Hoopster took the same path as to the provost who saved the university.</span>
