Answer:
None of the fixed costs are avoidable. Therefore the company now loses all the fixed costs and the positive contribution margin.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Wood Aluminum Hard Rubber
Total Sales $65000
Variable expenses (58000)
Contribution margin 7000
Fixed expenses (22000)
Net income (loss) (15000)
Effect on income= -22,000 - 7,000= -29,000
None of the fixed costs are avoidable. Therefore the company now loses all the fixed costs and the positive contribution margin.
Answer:
compromising
Explanation:
Compromising—when you compromise or “split the difference” in a conflict which is the political equivalent of "win some, lose some" and is possible in a long-term relationship where there is time for give-and-take exchange.
Education is considered as an investment in human capital. Human capital can be described as the knowledge, abilities and skills of an individual, acquired through education, training and experience, which help the latter to be more productive and thus improve his potential income earning.
"Suppose an economist test the theory that when the price of leather increases, fewer pairs of shoes ..."His observations invalidate the testability of his hypothesis since they go against the ceteris paribus premise. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is an economist?</h3>
Generally, an economist is simply defined as a professional in economics.
In conclusion, To illustrate, "let's say an economist investigates the hypothesis that higher leather costs lead to fewer shoe purchases." Since his findings contradict the ceteris paribus premise, his hypothesis cannot be tested.
Read more about economist
brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
Answer:
consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.
Explanation:
- The contract limits the resulting loss to lost profits from the use of the goods. The limit is not necessarily unconscious because lost profits are not necessarily significant and can be considered as direct or indirect losses.
- the contract may apply to both the lease and the sale and excluding some from the contract simply because it is a commercial loss makes no sense.
- so limit is not necessarily unconscionable because consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.