Because the decisive victory was followed shortly afterward by news of a peace treaty, many Americans at the time mistakenly believed the battle of new orleans had won the war
Answer:
Boll Weevils Or Fire caused by lighting are the worst
Answer:
Patriot militias were skilled at launching surprise attacks
Explanation:
Answer:
an argument or claim
Explanation:
An argument or claim is a statement of opinion on an issue which has multiple sides or perspectives a person can take.
The statement in the question provides a person's perspective on the issue of the Equal Rights Amendment. The amendment, when considered for ratification, had many differing opinions on whether or not it should be passed. The use of the word "should" also suggests it is the author's claim on the issue. The essay following the claim would provide evidence to support the claim along with analysis to explain how the evidence connects to the claim
Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
