Answer:
C. Price changes in markets provide suppliers incentives to supply goods to markets.
Explanation:
Price changes in the market has two perspective,
- increase in price, will increase the productivity for retailers,
- decrease in price, will decrease the productivity for retailers.
With increase the retailers expect to earn more, and with decrease the retailers expect to earn less.
This is a normal market condition and scenario, this does not link to any kind of political or legal environment, although the change in price might be due to political or legal policies, but the increase or decrease in productivity, is not related to any political or legal influence.
Answer:D.$14,100 gain
Explanation:
The par value of a bond is $100 when it's issued below the price it's issued at a discount which is a loss to the firm and when it's issued above the par value, it's issued at a premium which is a gain.
The issue of $705,000 means 7050 numbers were issued and retiring it $102 means at a premium of $2 per bond and a total of N14,100 gain.
Answer:
d. nominal GDP is $500, real GDP is $400, and the GDP deflator is 125.
Explanation:
Real GDP is total output produced in an economy within a given period multiplied by base year prices
Nominal GDP is the sum of all final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period multiplied by current year prices.
Nominal GDP = (100 × $3) + (50 × $4) =
$500
Real GDP = (100 × 1.5) + (50 × $5) = $400
GDP deflator = (nominal gdp / real gdp) x 100
(500 / 400) × 100 = 125
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Project manager
Explanation:
Glenda must be working as a<u> project manager</u>.
<em>A project manager is a person that leads the team to design and execute projects within an establishment. He/she also ensures monitoring and control of resources in order to get maximum results. </em>
Hence, Glenda must have been employed as a project manager for the telecommunication company.
Answer:
here you go bruv
Explanation:
The New York Times published a chart today that succinctly explains why it is so hard to cut the federal government's spending: the programs that people want to cut don't cost very much, and the programs that cost a lot people don't want to cut.
