Answer:
Point (1,8)
Step-by-step explanation:
We will use segment formula to find the coordinates of point that will partition our line segment PQ in a ratio 3:1.
When a point divides any segment internally in the ratio m:n, the formula is:
![[x=\frac{mx_2+nx_1}{m+n},y= \frac{my_2+ny_1}{m+n}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Bx%3D%5Cfrac%7Bmx_2%2Bnx_1%7D%7Bm%2Bn%7D%2Cy%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bmy_2%2Bny_1%7D%7Bm%2Bn%7D%5D)
Let us substitute coordinates of point P and Q as:
,




![[x=\frac{4}{4},y=\frac{32}{4}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Bx%3D%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B4%7D%2Cy%3D%5Cfrac%7B32%7D%7B4%7D%5D)
Therefore, point (1,8) will partition the directed line segment PQ in a ratio 3:1.
The simplified form of the expression; (3/4)-¹ as given in the task content is; 4/3.
<h3>What is the simplified form of the expression as given in the task content?</h3>
It follows from the task content that the expression in discuss can be simplified as follows by the laws of indices;
(3/4)-¹
Hence, due to negative exponent, the result is;
= 1 ÷ (3/4)¹
= 1 × (4/3)
= 4/3.
Read more on indices;
brainly.com/question/170984
#SPJ1
The answer is 91 toys sold, make
the number ab where a is the 10th digit and b is the first digit. The
value is 10a + b that can expressed as 10 (3) + 4 = 34
Let the price of each item: xy
10x + y
He accidentally reversed the
digits to: 10b + a toys sold at 10y + x rupees per toy. To get use the formula,
he sold 10a + b toys but thought he sold 10b + a toys. The number of toys that
he thought he left over was 72 items more than the actual amount of toys left
over. So he sold 72 more toys than he thought:
10a + b =10b + a +72
9a = 9b + 72
a = b + 8
The only numbers that could work
are a = 9 and b = 1 since a and b each have to be 1 digit numbers. He reversed
the digits and thought he sold 19 toys. So the actual number of toys sold was
10a + b = 10 (9) + 1 = 91 toys sold. By checking, he sold 91 – 19 = 72 toys
more than the amount that he though the sold. As a result, the number of toys
he thought he left over was 72 more than the actual amount left over as was
stated in the question.
<span />
The practical rule would be, times that number, by the result of the first time you multiplied the first number. But, it would all depend by how much your're raising the number by.
<u>
For example:</u>

We do,

But, once again, this was an example. This would show and illustrate the rule of "raising a power".<span />
I think that the answer for that one is A