Answer:
The answer is "21,622.98".
Explanation:
In the given question some information is missing, which can be defined in the given attachment.
To calculate the first cost we first subtract B cost is to X.
NPV = Cash Flow of the sum of PV amount
The value of Option A or NPV = -24,575.88
The value of Option B or NPV:
The value of Option B or NPV = -X -2952.9
As demanded
In Option B the value of NPV = In Option A the value of NPV
Answer:
$1,125,000
Explanation:
The total amount of property, plant, and equipment will appear under the Non-Current Assets section of the Balance Sheet. Thus prepare the Non Current Asset Section as follows :
Non Current Asset Section
Land $100,000
Land held for future use $150,000
Office Building $700,000
Equipment $450,000
Office Furniture $150,000
Accumulated Depreciation ($425,000)
Total $1,125,000
Answer:
d. selling products that appear to be locally adapted.
Explanation:
Localization:It refers to products which is locally adapted by the end-users. It is that thing which is easily adapted by the peoples and along with it, it can meet the needs of the people.
It overall impacts the customer buying behavior which includes their taste and preference, bargaining power, affordability, reasonable price, etc
By going throughout the options, the most correct option is D. So, other options are incorrect.
Answer:
$94,000
Explanation:
Henry Jones contributed a cash of $53,300 to the partnership
The equipment had a book value of $25,500 and a market value of $32,900
The inventory had a book value of $51,900 and a market value of $16,000
The partnership assumed a note payable of $14,500 that was owed by Henry
Therefore, the amount that should be recorded in Henry's capital can be calculated as follows
= $53,300+$39,200+$16,000-$14,500
= $108,500-$14,500
= $94,000
Hence $94,000 should be recorded in Henry's capital account
Answer:
Tax law uncertainty.
Explanation:
The “Tax law uncertainty” is the correct answer because it can be seen in the question that Congress has disallowed the deductions for advertisement in the future tax years. Since the decisions that the government takes are confidential and only a few people are aware of the decisions before its formal announcement. So the same case is here, Jolsen had a contract of $375000 annually and it will estimate that after obtaining the tax deduction, the advertisement cost will be lower. But the changes in the tax laws result in underestimated after-tax cost by Jolsen.
