The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
Answer:b heavy artillery fired rounds farther
Explanation:
I took the test on edge but I hope you do a good job make a I made a 96%
Answer: the French and Indian war in 1763, relations between the American colonists and the British crown and parliament quickly deteriorated.
Community policing arose out of the need to better connect with minority groups following and during the Civil Rights Movement. The movement had shown police to be hostile, violent, and obstructive in the methods. In response to this, police forces deemed it better to work with and learn from the communities instead of using force due to lack of understanding. This program eventually evolved into cultural learning programs in which multicultural education became a priority.
