Answer:
e. All of these are accepted.
Explanation:
If Vaughn was facing a significant decision. and Vaughn uses the classical model of decision making, then all the assumptions below will not be rejected
a. The decision maker is rational and uses logic in assigning values and evaluating alternatives.
b. The desired decision will maximize attainment of organizational objectives.
c. The decision-maker strives for complete certainty, gathering complete information.
d. Problems are precisely formulated and defined.
The reason for such conclusion is that the classical model which Vaughn uses prescribes the best way to make decisions, based on four assumptions:
- a clearly defined problem,
- eliminated uncertainty,
- access to full information, and
- rational behavior of the decision-maker.
These four conditions are same as those faced be Vaughn in the given scenario.
Answer:
Third party beneficiary.
Explanation:
This is easily seen in contracts as it is said that a third party beneficiary is a person that benefits from an agreement between two persons or a contract between two persons. This is despite the fact that this said person has no effect or was not in any way a part of the said contract.
A third party beneficiary can be denied the rights to compensation of the contract, especially when contract is not fulfilled.
Rights which makes the third party beneficiary valid and concretely a part of the contact are been attached and solidified if the said contract comes through.
Answer:
The correct option is c. she/he must account for a delay between the sale and the actual collection of the proceeds
Explanation:
As in the given question, it is mentioned that the credit sale is made, so the owner would remember the delay between the sale and the actual collection so that he knows the gap between these two.
Moreover, for cash budgeting purposes, it is necessary to remember when the owner received the cash and the date on which credit sale was made.
So, all other options are incorrect because it doesn't make any comparison between these two thing which is important for cash budgeting purposes.
Hence, The correct option is c. she/he must account for a delay between the sale and the actual collection of the proceeds
The ethical relativism principle represents that there is no means to identify between right and wrong in morality, while the moral relativism principle declares that there is no manner to differentiate between right and wrong in morality.
<h3>What is ethical and Moral relativism?</h3>
Morality is said to be relative to one's culture's norms, according to ethical relativism. To put it another way, the moral rules of the society in which a process is carried out decide whether it is proper or wrong.
A morally correct behavior in one civilization may be ethically incorrect in another. Acceptance of a fact-value gap has driven most kinds of ethical non-cognitivism, such as moral relativism.
Moral relativism, unlike ethical non-cognitivism, does not deny that moral assertions can be true; rather, it denies that they can be made true by an objective, transcultural moral order.
Therefore, the ethical and Moral relativism are the correct answers of the given problem.
Learn more about the morality, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13324831
#SPJ1
