Answer:
Sink-Cost Fallacy
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the mental bias that describes Les's behavior is called the Sink-Cost Fallacy. This fallacy/bias refers to when an individual relentlessly continues's a behavior solely because of the resources that they have invested, either being time, money, or effort. Which in this case since, Les invested money into the drink so he does not want to waste it even though it might make him sick.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Well obviously the economy is shrinking. people aren’t buying/trading much because they don’t want to risk going out and going through avoidable things you know?
Answer:
b) it is impracticable to determine some period-specific effects.
c) it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of prior years.
Explanation:
According to the actual normativity these are the two options more consistent with the exercise.
Answer:
Capitalized value $582.000.
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
- The common share of Miser had a fair value of $50 per share.
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
- Fair value of shares = Price per share * (Amount by selling scrap - exchanged shares)
- Capitalized value = fair value of shares - value of scrap.
Step 3. Calculation.
Fair value of shares = $50 * (18.000 - 6.000) = $600.000
<em />
<em>Land should be capitalized by fair market value of share exchanged less any recovery of scrap as land will be developed for future plant. </em>
Step 4. Solution.
<em />
Fair value of shares = $50*12.000 = $600.000
Less: value of scrap = $18.000 .
Capitalized value = $600.000 - $18.000 = $582.000.
