We have freedom of speech to say what we would like too. But if it degrades out higher power’s then it’s technically against the law. For social justice we can only say proven facts, anything else can we classified as a act of terrorism if we speak out again the government. Exp. Dr. Martin Luther King.
<span>Cattle farming was too expensive, so many farmers moved out to the Plains for </span><span>crop farming. There they had trouble with high interest in the banks, unfair </span><span>railroad fees, and overproduction from other farmers.
</span>The major problem faced by the farmer after the civil war
is the increase in the agricultural prices. This resulted to the
creation of the Farmer's Alliance to negotiate for lower amount. The
second problem is the expensive use of trains for transporting goods
that led to advocates to make railroads under public ownership. Another
one is the end of slavery wherein the rate of hiring slaves becomes
extremely high.
The five crucial values he described that would lead to the success of American constitution are: liberty,
Egalitarianism, Individualism,Populism, and Laissez-Faire
This depends on the system, the kind of information they need, etc...
In the most democratic countries, government sites might prove most reliable. In other, independent journalists might be better. In a way, it's almost impossible to be sure your information isn't biased.... the best is if you know who wrote it and what their agenda is: if they news is left-wing and what they report is not very left-wing, then it's perhaps reliable.
