1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolezko [41]
3 years ago
12

Which famous composer was the first to play concerts for the entire public, not just for the wealthy? He referred to this as "a

liberty of music."
a.
Bach
c.
Mozart
b.
Haydn
d.
Handel
History
1 answer:
Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
8 0
The famous composer who was the first to play concerts for the entire public, and not just the wealthy was Mozart. He referred to this as a "liberty of music." He liked the fact that he could play for whomever he chose and whenever he chose. The correct answer is Mozart. 
You might be interested in
Item 4
docker41 [41]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between artifact and fossil please help me asap pleaseeee I’ll give brainlist
uysha [10]
Fossils are the remains of living things, artifacts are remains of things that were made
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement BEST describes life in the Soviet Union under totalitarian leader Joseph Stalin?
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

B: critics of the government were murdered of imprisoned

8 0
3 years ago
Identify the main differences between Hamilton Senate and the actual Senate
grigory [225]

The Necessity of the Senate in the Federal Government ... pieces was a series of letters written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and ... preserve the Union, reconcile differences among states and political factions, and .... Return to Main Page ... The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

3 0
3 years ago
Explain the relationship between Jim Crow Laws and the court case "Plessy Vs Ferguson"
xxTIMURxx [149]

Jim Crow Laws enforced segregation between black and white people. The court case "Plessy Vs Ferguson" was trying to please people by enforcing the "separate but equal" law. Basically, they wanted to make the two races separate, but they thought it would be fine as long as both places were the same in quality and quantity.


To sum it up, Jim Crow Laws were to separate the two, but black people were given schools that weren't as good, trashy bathrooms, etc. It was also made to make sure that black people could not go some places on certain days, or at all. The "Plessy vs Ferguson" case was to try to make it better by separating the races, but having both bathrooms the same and both schools the same so none is better than the other.


I hope I helped.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Great Leap
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes what World War 2 internees faces when they returned home?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the 2 major developments that took place in West Africa roughtly 3 thousand years ago?​
    10·1 answer
  • What was the style of American blues developed
    14·1 answer
  • Q9: The purpose of the Federalist Papers in general was to? Convince Anti-Federalists states to ratify the Constituion Support f
    15·1 answer
  • Did men oppose the early American women’s rights movement?
    9·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes the structure of the executive branch?
    13·1 answer
  • Answer plss!!!!!!!!!!​
    10·1 answer
  • 'Life in the trenches was dull rather than dangerous.' Explain whether you agree or disagree.​
    11·1 answer
  • Answer this question if you know the answer
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!