B. eloquently
After writing for many hours, the journalist felt he had written an important piece that would improve the lives of others. He had written strategically and _eloquently_. He smiled with satisfaction; he may get paid for being a journalist, but he had discovered that being an activist was his true vocation.
Answer:
B. to lend impact to the sonnet's conclusion.
Explanation:
The lines present in the question were taken from Shakespeare's Sonnet 130. <u>The two lines at the end, or the final couplet, are structured in a different way from the others because their purpose is to lend impact to the sonnet's conclusion. Throughout the poem, the speaker is "criticizing" the woman he loves. </u>While Petrarchan sonnets were usually used to elevate women to an impossible status, comparing them to natural elements and concluding that they were always more beautiful, Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 does the opposite. The woman is a normal one, not more beautiful, sweeter, nor better smelling than anything else. <u>Still, at the final couplet, after all that criticism, the speaker says he loves her. Not only does he love her, but he won't lie about her. He loves her for who she really is.</u>
This passage does have the claim about the movie's quality. The soundness of the reasoning is relative to the evaluators ideals. Sound reasoning means simply that it is reasoning which makes sense, or is logical. The writer states their discontent for the movie, but lacks reasoning for the over length, poor acting, and boring music. To the individual evaluating, is was distasteful. I would probably say option A.
I would say that they shouldn't be surrounded by a lot of white space and should have clear captions. The question of white space is one of good presentation so the visual looks like an integral part of the whole topic and having clear captions is so that the visual is well explained what it is.
