You could say to the customer “sorry there is none available at the moment” and for them to come back and not be disappointed you can give them a discount voucher , therefore minimising the chance of that customer not returning.
Answer:
$8750.87
Explanation:
This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:
Where
F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)
P is the initial value (given 6900)
r is the rate of interest per period
here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)
t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12
Substituting, we get our answer:
<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
In an unregulated market, negative externality results in a higher social marginal cost than the firm marginal cost because this market is not properly regulated by the government officials. Hence, these firms are not taking into account the effect of negative externalities in their cost.
We know that the consumer's decision is more offenly based on the point where the marginal cost is equal to the marginal benefit because they are not taking the impact of negative externalities.
If proper action is not taken by the government, negative externality will result in a market inefficiencies.
Answer:
some goods aren't internationally traded
Explanation:
Purchasing power parity is most popularly known as the PPP. It may be defined as the measure of the prices of the various countries which makes use of the price of some specific goods in order to compare the absolute purchasing capability or power for the countries' currencies.
It is used to measure and compare prices at different locations.
The purchasing power does not hold good in the short to the medium run as different countries produces different goods and as such all the goods are not internally traded all over the locations or countries.
