Answer:
Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract
Explanation:
1. 1. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Juan?
The most important point of focus from the aspect of the law and statute of frauds is that from the scenario it was stated clearly that ''She has a <u>five-year written contract with Juan to sell him as many roses as he needs for his wedding chapel.</u> ''
Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract
2. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Ann?
The scenario states clearly that ''Ann emailed Olivia an order for <u>"1,000 white stems''</u> and ''Olivia instead sent orchids, the only "white stems" available at the time.''
Hence Olivia fulfilled Ann's orders and Ann has absolutely no case at all. Olivia has acted in accordance to Ann's request and has full rights to claim her payment.
3. What defenses, if any, do Juan and Ann have?
In summary the defenses of both parties are weak
1. Juan has a defense of unforeseen financial difficulties but this will be insufficient to override a written contract
2. Ann assumed that Olivia would send roses but assumption does not work in the eyes of the law but written agreements.
Additionally, Ann could argue that Olivia should have communicated the price of the orchids at the point of processing Ann's orders.
