1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nikolay [14]
3 years ago
7

When a performer closely resembles in real life the character to be enacted, this is known as?

Social Studies
1 answer:
natita [175]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is: typecasting 
You might be interested in
What was the outcome of the Boston massacre
densk [106]
Increased colonist anger towards the British.
5 0
3 years ago
Dr. Smith believes that the ability to perceive the world in a competent, organized way is innate. Dr. Smith seems to uphold the
vladimir2022 [97]

<u>Answer: </u>

Dr. Smith believes that the ability to perceive the world in a competent, organized way is innate. Dr. Smith seems to uphold the nativist view.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The nativist view held by Dr. Smith tends him to believe that the very nature of human beings to look at the world as being organized in a disciplined manner comes from within.
  • He justifies the competent behavior exhibited by humans by referring to the internal belief of the humans that makes them keep the world organized.
7 0
3 years ago
This is a deleted question
andrew-mc [135]

Answer:

usyfusegvkjdfgvuasdgivhdsguivsduigvudsgvudsgvudsgfoshcvjsdgvu8sdghkv,bmxchvgs89eyfsgdyufvuerifiasgjvusdgfiuasgfjksdgfudsof

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
[WILL MARK BRAINLIEST] How does globalization change our perspectives on our cultural practices, from the foods we eat to the mu
Basile [38]

Answer:

Globalization has made it so that we can share ideas, practices, ect in a way that makes it readily available. When a business or organization starts to develop international influence it becomes a trend in the twentieth century more than likely, making this new idea more accepted and better viewed.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is about continuing to foster the memory of a person"s life even after he or she dies by involving the person in our daily lives
    13·1 answer
  • Choice of membership in particular cliques and crowds is often determined by the degree of ___________ within members of the gro
    6·1 answer
  • Strong emotions and pain acting through the limbic system activate sympathetic centers in the hypothalamus, thus modulating resp
    9·1 answer
  • Societies make decisions about what goods should be produced by
    6·1 answer
  • What is it called when there is hostility and ill- treatment towards someone because of their race , political , or religious be
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following identifies two of the causes of the War of 1812? A. William Henry Harrison led American soldiers against
    5·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo se podría reflejar los elementos religiosos y culturales en la vida cotidiana de una escuela infantil (3-6 años)?
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone Wanna Try Deep fried Water? It’s pretty tasty
    9·2 answers
  • Name the country which borders Argentina to the west
    12·1 answer
  • Robert rescorla’s contingency model of classical conditioning states that.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!