Answer:
A. Drug Complications
Explanation:
The answer could also be abuse as drug complications can be related to drug complications, however those are also effects of drug complications.
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
Answer:
Crime analysis. This type of information is available in every police department; it is obtained by plotting offenses on a wall map and organizing the information on crime reports for the major purpose of identifying patterns of criminal activity.
Intelligence analysis aids investigations by helping to target available resources and identifying information gaps to focus the investigation more clearly. It also helps to avoid duplication of effort and prevent straying into areas of no relevance.
1. Is administrator
2 a power of attorney
3. I THINK it is his or her spouse
4 if all beneficiaries consent to the trusts termination
5 holographic will
6 health care proxy
7 testamentary trust
8 intestate
9 trustee
10 beneficiaries
Answer:
lose because employee contracts that restrict trade are illegal
Explanation:
The above case relates to the restraint of trade. Export limitations are a concept in customary law referring to the constitutionality in commercial limits on the right to do commerce. This is a forerunner to the current rule to competition.
A statutory commitment not to exchange is null and unenforceable towards the Promiser as opposed to the national policy of encouraging commerce, although the restriction of exchange is fair to preserve the rights of a trade buyer. Trade restrictions may also manifest as binding covenants in work arrangements throughout post-termination.
