1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
10

Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices?

Law
2 answers:
dem82 [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)

Explanation:

Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices? The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)

Temka [501]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)

Explanation:

Which supreme court decision had nine different opinions written by the justices? The answer is furman v georgia ( fact as it happened in 1972)

You might be interested in
WILL GIVE THANKS PLUS BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP ME!!
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

the awnser to this question B

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Patricia Plaintiff files a lawsuit against Donald Defendant for breach of contract. The law that governs the subject area of her
MrMuchimi

Explanation:

state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law.

4 0
2 years ago
Settlement payment from carnell smith and lenox magee v. fifth third bank class action settlement
Igoryamba

In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.

The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.

In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults

8 0
2 years ago
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Feliz [49]

Explanation:

There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Once a court determines that a waiver is appropriate in a particular case, what happens to the defendant?
Volgvan

Answer:

"Standard 15- 1.2. Waiver of trial by jury

(a) Cases required to be tried by jury should be so tried, unless jury trial is waived with the consent of the prosecutor.

(b) The court should not accept a waiver unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by jury and the consequences of waiver of jury trial, personally waives the right to trial by jury in writing or in open court on the record.

(c) A defendant may not withdraw a voluntary and knowing waiver as a matter of right, but the court, in its discretion, may permit withdrawal prior to the commencement of the trial.

(d) A defendant may withdraw a waiver of jury trial as a matter of right, and a prosecutor may withdraw consent to a waiver as a matter of right if there is a change in the trial judge.

Standard 15- 1.3. Waiver of full jury or of unanimous verdict*

(a) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the jury shall consist of any number less than that required for a full jury.

(b) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the verdict may be less than unanimous. The stipulation should be clear as to the number of concurring jurors required for the verdict to be valid.

(c) The court should not accept such a stipulation unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by a full jury, personally waives the right to trial by a full jury, or the right to a unanimous verdict, in open court on the record."

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is criminal contempt of court vs civil contempt of court?
    10·1 answer
  • In a burglary, pry or tool marks on a window may NOT act as ______. a. corpus delecti evidence
    7·2 answers
  • What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review
    10·1 answer
  • why wont i level up from ambitious to the next level i have than 500 points and 5 brainliest im super confused
    9·2 answers
  • Which term refers to the legitimate writings that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery?
    13·1 answer
  • On the 4th of July, Anne and Sam have a picnic at a county campground near Sam's
    5·2 answers
  • C. The length, breadth and height of the box is 5m,6m and 7m respectively. Find its volume.​
    9·1 answer
  • Do police have to tell you why you are being detained?
    10·2 answers
  • What do the different levels of licenses for security guards show about Florida’s monitoring methods?
    6·1 answer
  • Examples of agreements that violate government statutes and are unenforceable by the courts are contracts for the sale of alcoho
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!