Answer: (give brainliest)
False
True
False
Answer: 1. before they had moved in they should have checked everywear in the house for this specific reason. 2. the couple should have gotten the mold professionally removed or resolved ( replaced the wood or use some prevention chemicals).
Explanation:
if they had done these things the child would have most likely been fine i also dont know how this relates with "law"
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
