In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Tu familia te odia no te van amar nunca
Answer:
House search
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant be based on probable cause, and must describe the persons and places to be searched as well as the items to be seized. A judicial warrant (often called a criminal warrant) is used by police to search a person or place for evidence of a crime.
Answer and Explanation:
Correctional officers can use force only when prisoners are threatening their own security, the security of the agent or the safety of other prisoners and officials. However, there are other ways to neutralize hostility, through dialogue and the attempt to resolve dangerous situations in a more peaceful way and without compromising the physical integrity of anyone. In addition, it is important to emphasize that the use of force must be done without causing death or serious injuries.
