Benjamin and Sarah Abbot accused Martha Carrier being a witch because Benjamin fell gravely ill after his argument with Martha over a land property. In Sarah's testimony, she <span>also claimed that her husband's illness was not the only thing that Martha had caused. She said Benjamin's </span><span>cattle strangely died without a natural reason. They used these reasons as proof that Martha was a witch. However, their evidence was subjective because they had no physical evidence to prove. Their accusation was merely from the fact that Benjamin </span>fell<span> ill after he argued with Martha. </span>
<span> </span>
Answer:
These philosophers attempted to expand the conceptions of religion, attaching aspects of reason and critical thinking. These points were the fundamental basis of the Baroque, once this period was extremely religious, but also a moment in history when science and the thought was in development, a heritage from the Renaissance. Descartes, Spinoza and Leibinz are traditionally considered as Rationalists philosophers. Each one of them believed that our knowledge born with us (Innatism).
Explanation:
As a conception of philosophical knowledge, the Rationalism began to take shape during the Renaissance, but its early origins can go back to Greek philosophy, with Platonic idealist theses and the conception of the principle of causality. For the rationalists, all the ideas we have originate from pure rationality, which also imposes an innate conception, that is, that the ideas have innate origins in the human being, being born with us in our intellect and being used and discovered by the people who they make better use of reason.
This is a condition having tail in a crack.
Explanation:
In the given question, the scenario is that there is a legal restriction, called as entailment, with the Cunningham family, while selling a piece of their land for the purpose of gaining money or profit. According to the legal term, entailment, the owner of the land or house is unable to sell it for profit. The property can only be transferred to the other member of the family.
So now it is a logical example that having a tail in the crack. It means that when tail of an animal is stuck in a crack, that animal is unable to move. So this example best illustrates the situation of the Cunningham Family, as they are facing the entailment, and stuck with the land which they own and which they cannot sell for profit. They do not have any other choice than staying with the land, which means their tail is stuck in the crack.
Learn more about entailment at:
brainly.com/question/13568955
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
WDYEGWHDBHABDD CJDCBWUDG EWUHVWYEG
Explanation:
