It would be more logical to have an abundant amount of resources than to be in a center of a training route. Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 is an example. America suffered more even though it was meant to punish France and Great Britain. If America had more supplies then they wouldn't have any issue with trading with someone else. America is across the sea so it is hard to believe they were in the center of the training route.
Having a good location is important, but if there isn't enough to trade then that creates more issues. One would be that the area could become a reputation for being unreliable. It does come to the question if the loads of resources is worth traveling for or to take a route that's faster but there isn't a lot of give. Being isolated also means that of there happens to be an issue in the trade then the location is either off the maps or people don't want to there because of the distance and the prices might be able to go up. That's why resources are better than location.
That statement is False
In Type a and Type B personality theory, the Type A people are described as competitive, impatient, ambitious, and Aggressive, which mean that Type A personalities are more prone to stress than more people
THE FEDERAL ANALOGY AND STATE
APPORTIONMENT STANDARDS
Robert B. McKay*
Baker v. Carr' appears at first impression to be a prime example in the
American judicial tradition of deciding no more than is absolutely essential
for disposition of the immediate case. It purported to decide only questions
of jurisdiction, justiciability, and standing to sue2 where a claim was made
that state legislative apportionment in Tennessee arbitrarily impaired voting
rights. But only the wilfully blind could fail to see an invitation, if not a command,
to a reordering of state legislative apportionment laws and practices.
Indeed, Mr. Justice Brennan, in a footnote to his opinion for the Court, almost
gave the whole show away when he referred to "our holding that the complaint
states a federal constitutional claim of violation of the Equal Protection Clause."'
Justice Douglas, in his separate concurring opinion, stated flatly that "if the
allegations in the complaint can be sustained a case for relief is established." 4
And Mr. Justice Clark was ready to decide the case on the merits. Because he
found "that Tennessee's apportionment is a crazy quilt without rational basis, 5
he concluded that "the Tennessee apportionment statute offends the Equal
Protection Clause. . ".."6 Although the majority more conservatively remanded
the case to the three-judge district court where it had originated, the reaction
in that court demonstrated that the Supreme Court opinions were read to
foreclose continuance of the existing apportionment. By the time the case came
back to the district court for reconsideration in light of Baker, the defendants
had conceded the invalidity of the existing laws and the Tennessee legislature
had enacted a new apportionment formula, which the three-judge court also
* B.S., LL.B.; Professor of Law, New York University; Member, District of Columbia,
Kansas, and United States Supreme Court Bars.
1 369 U.S. 186 (1962). 2 So Mr. justice Brennan said for the Court. Id. at 197-98. Mr. justice Stewart stated
that the Court decided these "three things and no more." Id. at 265 (concurring opinion). 3 Id. at 195 n.15. Perhaps he used the word "claim" in the sense of "allegation,
Answer: Family
Explanation:
Family is a group of people that share common characteristics based on their genetical and morphological composition which can be found to be similar. The family is a group of people who are related via marriage like two parents and their children will constitute a family and any other person who is linked with a social or relation bond can also be the part of the family. In family a feeling of unity stays when members live together or also when they are separated due to affection and care for others. They interact with each other to help each other, and satisfy the needs of others.
Answer:
1. Farm Diary 2. The cash book and payment receipt 3. Annual valuation record4. Farm inventory 5. Yield and production record
Explanation:
