I can't really answer this for you because this is YOUR opinion but here's what I would've said; Yes, I would have because of the extreme hardships the militia men had to go through. During that winter, many soldiers had suffered the consequences of going through and not quitting the journey but if I were one of them, I would've quit. Even though I know that I have to fight for the country, I would not have been able to go through with the lasting consequences. Men had to walk through treacherous snow which also was cold and wet, this was not a good environment for soldiers to be in.
Answer: The colonists were not used to the lifestyle. They didn’t know how to live in the woods, or how to hunt and fish.
Miranda v. Arizona was the reason that the fifth amendment was put into place. The fifth amendment states that people cannot be subjected to capital punishment without their rights being read to them and that's how we got the Miranda rights.
The development of agriculture occur circa around 8000-6000 years ago. It was a time where many nomadc population begin to settle in a place, thus effectively starting the civilization as we know now. it was a huge shift for humanity and it was probably one of the most important, if not <em>the</em> most important achievement in human history.
---
It was quickly accepted as the preferred food source by people living in settlements because it could be planned and organized, thus helping people reaching a balance easily and preventing them from being dependent from the results of hunt and gathering. it was a safe and sicure way to assure food for everyone.
The argument of missile defense in the nation of Cuba is a non-starter because the USA will never willingly allow a nation that is so close to its territory, and is an ally of its arch enemy, Russia, to have such a defensive system installed, because it will also mean that Russia may use Cuba as its military base and threaten the USA territory at any moment, from close proximity, and also they will have a protection by any attack as a response.
