1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
5

Do you think civilian (nonmilitary) control of the military is an important part of U.S. democracy? Why or why not? What are the

advantages to this system? Are there disadvantages? Write a well-developed paragraph expressing your opinion.
History
1 answer:
QveST [7]3 years ago
5 0

Civilian control of the military is an important component of Republican government. Civilian control means that military leaders are subordinate to political leaders. The Commander in Chief of the military is the President, a political leader. He is responsible for making the final decisions regarding whether or not the military should engage in conflict. This is a safeguard in a democratic society and prevents the military from using its power to assert political control. The disadvantages are few to none. This system of subordination has worked well in the United States. The President also has the right to suspend habeas corpus and broad powers to ensure law and order in the case of an emergency,

You might be interested in
The maya civilization had many achievements, including __________.
arlik [135]


Because they created vast array of the
Structures including places and mathematics system
7 0
2 years ago
Which best describes Japan's policy during WW2.
Finger [1]
I think it is eather a or b
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
All of the following are examples of the Environment element of the Six Essential Elements of Geography except
Ludmilka [50]
4 i think it is 4 guys and gals
3 0
3 years ago
Read the passage and then answer question that follows.
Firdavs [7]
The answer is B, none of the other ones work
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Austrian Empire, what group(s) wanted to establish an autonomous state?
romanna [79]
<span>Remember, at the time, it was the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The Empire (unlike any of the other major states in Europe) was a patchwork of over a dozen major ethnic groups. Nationalism tends to organize along ethnic boundaries (that is, nations tend to form around a large concentration of one ethnic group). Thus, with a very large number of different ethnic groups, the Empire had to worry about each group wanting to split from the Empire, and form its own nation. Indeed, after WW1, this is what happened to the Empire - it was split into about a 8 different countries (or, more accurately, portions of 8 countries included lands formerly part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire).</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma brought awareness to Americans of
    11·1 answer
  • Which dynasty was responsible for establishing a complex bureaucracy?
    7·2 answers
  • 25 points Please
    8·2 answers
  • What is papyrus? <br><br> What is dynasty?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did white southern Democrats disenfranchise black men
    6·1 answer
  • Enumerated' goods:
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone please explain the four methods of change? (Federal Laws, U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Constitutional Amendments, a
    14·1 answer
  • When did the Civil War end
    7·1 answer
  • By what means did the early ottomans expand their empire
    5·1 answer
  • During the period of reconstruction that followed the civil war (1865–1873), the __________ party controlled texas politics.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!