Two of the most famous Roman satirists were Horace and Juvenal.
Horace wrote about political issues, as well as everyday life of people in the Roman Empire - he used light-hearted humor in order to ridicule or mock the opinions about philosophy, which were usually wrong. His aim was to make people smile, not to anger them any further by mocking some of their flaws - he didn't try to attack anyone personally.
On the other hand, when it comes to Juvenal's satire, it was a lot harsher than Horace's. He viciously attacked anyone he disagreed with in his writing, ridiculing them in order to make fun of them in quite a negative and contemptuous way. He mocked the structure of the society, public officials, because he wanted to change both the society and its politics.
Answer:
Explanation:
Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below. There was very little social mobility; the children of peasants became peasants, while the children of lords became lords and ladies.
Because they needed jobs, so they moved to industial cities up north to work in facturies etc.
Many of the people came to escape religious persecution
Old Lights and New Lights preachers both followed Protestantism. How did the two differ? ... Old Lights preachers believed religion should be practiced in a rational way while New Lights preachers propagated emotion in religion.
